The Social Psychology of Good and Evil

نویسندگان

  • Arthur G. Miller
  • CRAIG A. ANDERSON
  • NICHOLAS L. CARNAGEY
چکیده

Note: This pdf was created from scanned book pages that were then run through OCR software. It therefore is likely to contain some errors not in the original. It is provided to you as a courtesy of the authors. Please do not post or distribute this version in any form that would violate the copyrights of the authors, the book editor, or the publisher. coordinated attack, terrorists hijacked four commercial jets and succeeded in flying two of them into the World Trade Center Towers in New York City, and one into the Pentagon. The fourth, apparently targeted for the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC, crashed in a Pennsylvania field when passengers attacked the hijackers. The final death toll was over 2,800 (The National Obituary Archive, 2002). We label the most extreme forms of aggression as "violent evil" in this chapter. Hopes that the horrors of World War II and the Holocaust would produce a worldwide rejection of such inhuman actions and a resulting end of genocidal practices, a cessation of wars among nations, and a reduction in homicide rates have been dashed by the realities of war, homicide , and genocide in the last half of the 20th century. The litany of recent genocidal events is both long and depressing, including major massa-The beginning of the 21st century has not provided much relief either, as dearly illustrated by the September Violent Evil and the General Aggression Model 169 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the subsequent "war on terrorism" in Afganistan, the escalating conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, the ethnic/religious massacres in India, and the recent (and continuing) war in Iraq. Of course, human violence is not new. Archeological and historical evidence makes it dear that violence was prevalent among our hunter/ gatherer ancestors 25,000 years. ago, among the Greek, Egyptian, and Roman societies 2,000-3,000 years ago, among most societies in the last two centuries, and in almost every society today. Although technological advances have made mass violence easier to accomplish, "people" today are not more violence-prone than they were thousands of years ago. Nonetheless, the prevalence of violence in contemporary society, the efficiency of modern weapons, and differences in violence rates between societies have collectively inspired a resurgence of interest in understanding such behavior at individual, group, and societal levels. The hope, of course, is that such understanding will lead to significant reductions in future rates of violence at each …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Commanding Good and Forbidding Evil; a Theoretical Solution for Struggles against Shah's Regime from Imam Khomeini's Viewpoint

Imam Khomeini's struggle against Pahlavi's regime was founded on numerous jurisprudential bases, an important one of which is commanding good and forbidding evil. In this article, first the jurisprudential explanation of commanding good and forbidding evil from Imam Khomeini's viewpoint has been offered and then, a historic-analytic approach has been applied to find examples in his stances from...

متن کامل

Hospital Employees’ Knowledge of Enjoining Good and Forbidding Evil

Background and Objectives: Enjoining good and forbidding (EGFE) evil are two fundamental topics in Islam. Many verses and narratives underscore the social, religious and political duties implied by enjoining good and forbidding evil. After all, these two divine treasures have been neglected because of indulgence and forgetfulness. The prime reason for this negligence seems to be the obliviousne...

متن کامل

Hospital Employees’ Knowledge of Enjoining Good and Forbidding Evil

Background and Objectives: Enjoining good and forbidding (EGFE) evil are two fundamental topics in Islam. Many verses and narratives underscore the social, religious and political duties implied by enjoining good and forbidding evil. After all, these two divine treasures have been neglected because of indulgence and forgetfulness. The prime reason for this negligence seems to be the obliviousne...

متن کامل

Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients.

Moral agency is the capacity to do right or wrong, whereas moral patiency is the capacity to be a target of right or wrong. Through 7 studies, the authors explored moral typecasting-an inverse relation between perceptions of moral agency and moral patiency. Across a range of targets and situations, good- and evil-doers (moral agents) were perceived to be less vulnerable to having good and evil ...

متن کامل

Attitude toward Enjoining Good and Forbidding Evil in an Iranian Hospital

Background and Objectives: Appropriate attitude about Enjoining good and forbidding evil (EGFE) as two fundamental topics in Islam that are known as a social phenomenon can use as a powerful tool in Islamic organizations to promote happiness, management improvement and correction of defficiencies. The objective was to assess attitude of hospital staff regarding enjoining good and forbidding evi...

متن کامل

(An Analysis of Principle no.8 of the Constitution)

This article has analyzed principle no.8 of the Constitution from three aspects: 1-verbal analysis 2-conceptual analysis 3-ways to execute this principle. In first section a precise definition of "call to good", "good and evil" (both in law and in jurisprudence) and "government" have been presented. In second section to have a better understanding of principle no.8, issues such as the relation ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004